Links
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- May 2012 (1)
- March 2012 (1)
- February 2012 (6)
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (2)
- September 2011 (7)
- August 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (2)
- March 2011 (1)
- February 2011 (3)
- January 2011 (2)
- December 2010 (3)
- October 2010 (4)
- September 2010 (3)
- August 2010 (4)
- July 2010 (6)
- June 2010 (6)
- May 2010 (1)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (3)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (1)
- December 2009 (3)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (5)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (4)
- July 2009 (11)
- June 2009 (7)
- May 2009 (6)
- April 2009 (3)
- March 2009 (3)
- February 2009 (3)
- January 2009 (9)
- December 2008 (1)
- November 2008 (7)
- October 2008 (4)
- September 2008 (4)
- August 2008 (9)
- July 2008 (18)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (1)
- April 2008 (3)
- March 2008 (9)
- February 2008 (7)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (7)
- November 2007 (2)
- October 2007 (5)
- September 2007 (10)
- August 2007 (4)
- July 2007 (8)
- June 2007 (3)
- May 2007 (6)
- April 2007 (1)
- March 2007 (5)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (4)
- December 2006 (1)
- November 2006 (1)
- October 2006 (4)
- September 2006 (3)
- August 2006 (2)
- July 2006 (1)
- June 2006 (3)
- May 2006 (3)
- April 2006 (6)
- March 2006 (7)
- February 2006 (9)
- January 2006 (12)
- December 2005 (1)
March 31, 2009
March 18, 2009
Using is knowing
We talk about writing in plain language so that a person can understand and use the information. Someone said something a while back that suggested a person could “use” information if it was in a brochure that they could refer to when needed. This led me to thinking about my different perspective.
I think using information means knowing it and being able to retrieve it from memory whenever it is needed. No reference document. It may be I think this way because of my long experience in training and curriculum design for adults.
I am now pondering the extent to which my internalization of the principles of adult education has influenced my approach to plain language writing and editing.
Just wanted to let you know why I have not been posting. I am working on a new plain language writing manual for general use (meaning not for legal writers) and I am thinking through some issues like this.
Comments Off
March 10, 2009
Use plain English, appear smarter (and more persuasive)
In case you need evidence, Ray Ward summed it up awhile ago:
I just finished reading Yes! 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be Persuasive (hat tip to the [non]billable hour). One of the 50 ways confirms something Bryan Garner says in The Winning Brief (p. 177, 2d ed.): people who use plain language are perceived as smarter and more persuasive than people who do the opposite:
“… Take, for example, the fact that communicators frequently try to convey their erudition via their grandiloquent, magniloquent, sesquipedalian verbosity; in other words, they try to look smart by using unnecessarily long words or overly technical jargon….
“… [R]esearch by [Daniel] Oppenheimer has shown that using overly complex language like this can produce the exact opposite of the intended effect: Because the audience has difficulty interpreting the language, the message is deemed less convincing and the author is perceived to be less intelligent.”
In an endnote, the Yes! authors cite D.M. Oppenheimer, Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: Problems with using long words needlessly, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20:139–56.
So there you have it: scientific proof that plain language aids persuasion.
Comments Off
